×

JOIN in 3 Steps

1 RSVP and Join The Founders Meeting
2 Apply
3 Start The Journey with us!
+1(310) 574-2495
Mo-Fr 9-5pm Pacific Time
  • SUPPORT

M ACCELERATOR by M Studio

M ACCELERATOR by M Studio

AI + GTM Engineering for Growing Businesses

T +1 (310) 574-2495
Email: info@maccelerator.la

M ACCELERATOR
824 S. Los Angeles St #400 Los Angeles CA 90014

  • WHAT WE DO
    • HOW WE WORK
      • The Studio Approach
      • Elite Founders
      • Strategy & GTM Engineering
    • Other Programs
      • Entrepreneurship & Innovation Programs
      • Business Innovation
  • COMMUNITY
    • Our Framework
    • COACHES & MENTORS
    • PARTNERS
    • TEAM
  • BLOG
  • EVENTS
    • SPIKE Series
    • Pitch Day & Talks
    • Our Events on lu.ma
Join
AIAcceleration
  • Home
  • blog
  • News
  • Accelerator Terms in 2026: What 33 Top Programs Actually Take, and What They Hide

Accelerator Terms in 2026: What 33 Top Programs Actually Take, and What They Hide

Alessandro Marianantoni
Monday, 06 July 2026 / Published in News

Accelerator Terms in 2026: What 33 Top Programs Actually Take, and What They Hide

Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'What 33 Accelerators Actually Take'.

You have two accelerator offers in your inbox and a spreadsheet full of numbers pulled from blog posts. One post says Techstars takes 6 to 9 percent for $120k. Another says Neo invests $600k on a $10M floor. A third lists IndieBio’s biotech deal. Here is the problem: all three of those numbers are wrong in 2026. Techstars moved to $220k in Fall 2025. Neo replaced its accelerator with a $750k residency in February 2026. IndieBio no longer exists as a brand.

Accelerator terms change constantly and almost nobody dates their data. The comparison content you find ranks well, reads confidently, and describes deals that stopped existing years ago. If you are choosing between offers, or deciding whether to apply at all, you are likely negotiating against stale numbers.

So we verified the terms ourselves: 33 programs, checked against each program’s own published pages, with a source and an as-of date on every row. Where a program does not publish a number, the table says so, because that silence is information too.

What the top accelerators actually take in 2026

The condensed table below covers the headline terms. The full database adds sources, as-of dates, program length and format, follow-on rights, and regional variations for every row.

ProgramCheckEquityInstrumentFeesWorth knowing
Y Combinator$500k ($125k + $375k)7% on the $125kPost-money SAFE + uncapped MFN SAFENonePro-rata in later rounds; US, Canada, Cayman, Singapore entities only
Techstars$220k ($20k + $200k)Min 5% common, plus SAFE conversionCEA + uncapped MFN SAFENoneNew deal since Fall 2025; APAC programs still $120k total
a16z speedrunUp to $1M ($500k now + $500k next round)10% on the upfront $500kSAFENoneNo board seat; requires employee option pool
South Park Commons$1M ($400k now + $600k guaranteed follow-on)7% on the $400kSAFENone$600k participation in your next external round is guaranteed
Neo Residency$750k + $450k compute creditsNo fixed %, uncappedUncapped SAFENone publishedReplaced Neo Accelerator in Feb 2026; converts at next round price
Entrepreneur FirstUp to $250k ($125k + optional $125k)8% on the first $125kPost-money SAFE + uncapped MFN SAFENoneSecond tranche requires Delaware C-corp + SF relocation
500 Global (Flagship)$150k6%Not publishedNot published; reportedly $37.5k deducted from the checkNet cash may be ~$112.5k; verify before signing
Antler (US)“$500K-$1M” commitment, structure not publishedNot publishedNot publishedNone to joinLast published deal (2023: $250k at $2.75M post) is likely obsolete
SOSV (HAX / SOSV SF / SOSV NY)Up to ~$550k average pre-seed10%+ ownership targetPost-money SAFE, no cap, target ownership statedNone statedHAX first check is $250k: $150k cash + $100k in-kind
PearX$250k to $2M by stageNot publishedNot publishedNoneRequires SF Bay Area relocation; 9 months free office
gener8tor$100k7.5%SAFENone statedTerms non-negotiable; gBETA is their free no-equity track
ERA (NYC)$150k6%Post-money SAFENone publishedTwo 4-month NYC cohorts per year
Berkeley SkyDeck$210k7.5%Post-money SAFE$7.5k program feeHalf of fund profits go back to UC Berkeley
AngelPad$120k + credits~7% (5% common + ~2%)Common stock + investmentNone statedNo documented cohort since 2019; verify it is actually running
Alchemist~$30k net average~5% typical, flexibleCommon equity grantTuition netted against investmentEnterprise focus; 6 months, remote-friendly
AI Grant$250k + $600k creditsNo fixed %Uncapped no-discount MFN SAFENoneConverts at your next round’s terms
HF0Not publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedSecondary sources conflict ($1M for 5% vs $500k + 3%); ask directly
Betaworks CampUp to $500kNot publishedNot publishedNone; travel on youThematic cohorts; NYC residency required at start and end
Sequoia ArcNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedTerms are explicitly company-specific by design
Founder InstituteNo cash invested2.5% warrantWarrantYou pay: $799 to $1,199, more for teamsEquity is shared with local leaders and mentors
StartupbootcampEUR 25k expense coverage8% per 2024 pages; not restated sinceDirect shareholdingNone statedAsk for the current percentage in writing
Station F Founders ProgramNo standard investment0% automaticConditional EUR 50k co-investment rightDesk fee from EUR 259/monthThe old 1% stake was dropped in the Feb 2024 terms
LAUNCH$125k7%Not published on current pagesNone published14 weeks, heavy fundraising focus
43North$1M to 5 winners/year5%Warrant, non-negotiableNoneRequires Buffalo relocation; 2026 is the final competition
MassChallengeZero-equity cash prizes0%NoneNoneNon-dilutive; eligibility caps on prior funding and revenue
Plug and PlayNo standard check0% for the programSeparate optional VC investmentNoneProgram acceptance and investment are separate decisions
NVIDIA InceptionNo investment0%NoneNoneMembership program: credits, GPU pricing, investor exposure
StartXNo funding stated0%NoneNoneStanford founder community
Dreamit$500k-$1.5M pre-Series A“Small amount”, % not publishedNot publishedNot publishedNo longer a classic cohort accelerator; securetech focus
Afore FIR“At least $100k”, flexibleNot publishedNot publishedNone10 weeks in SF, 5 to 8 teams
BoomtownNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedAppears pivoted to corporate innovation; no open cohort found
APX (Berlin)No program since 2021n/an/an/aNow an earliest-stage VC, still investing
Village GlobalNo program as of 2026n/an/an/aNow a pre-seed/seed VC writing $500k-$3M lead checks

Condensed view. Every figure comes from the program’s own published pages except where marked; figures the program does not disclose are listed as not published rather than filled with guesses.

Get the full database

The complete version adds a source link and an as-of date for every row, plus program length and format, follow-on and pro-rata rights, regional term variations, and the notes on which widely-cited numbers are now obsolete. It is a live spreadsheet, so it gets corrections as programs update their deals.

What a point of equity costs, program by program

One way to compare transparent programs: divide the cash wired at acceptance by the fixed equity percentage. This ignores uncapped SAFE tranches (which convert into additional dilution later at your next round’s price), so treat it as a comparison of headline deals, not final ownership math.

ProgramCash at acceptanceFixed equityCash per point
gener8tor$100k7.5%$13.3k
Entrepreneur First$125k (first tranche)8%$15.6k
ERA$150k6%$25.0k
500 Global$150k (before reported fee deduction)6%$25.0k
Berkeley SkyDeck$210k (before $7.5k fee)7.5%$28.0k
Techstars$220k5% minimum$44.0k
a16z speedrun$500k upfront10%$50.0k
South Park Commons$400k upfront7%$57.1k
Y Combinator$500k7%$71.4k

Read this the way an investor would. The programs paying the most per point (YC, SPC, a16z) are pricing in their acceptance rate and network effect. The programs paying the least are pricing in geography or stage. Neither end is wrong, but you should know which trade you are making. A $100k check for 7.5% prices your company at $1.33M post. A $500k check for 7% prices it at $7.1M. Same word, accelerator, five-times difference in implied valuation.

The fee traps

Four patterns in the data deserve a highlighted warning:

You pay them. Founder Institute charges founders $799 to $1,199 up front (teams pay 1.5x to 2x) and still takes a 2.5% warrant, shared among local leaders, mentors, and headquarters.

The check is smaller than the headline. 500 Global’s flagship page says $150k for 6%. Multiple secondary sources report a $37.5k program fee deducted from that check, and 500’s own regional pages publish a comparable fee structure. If you get an offer, ask what lands in your bank account.

The investment nets against tuition. Alchemist’s structure results in average net proceeds around $30k. That is not hidden, but it surprises founders who read “accelerator investment” and expect six figures.

The program fee rides alongside the SAFE. Berkeley SkyDeck invests $210k for 7.5% and charges a $7.5k program fee per startup.

What programs do not publish is also data

The transparency spread is wide. YC, Techstars, EF, a16z speedrun, and South Park Commons publish complete deals: amount, instrument, percentage, conditions. PearX and Betaworks publish the check but not the equity. HF0 publishes essentially nothing, and the secondary sources contradict each other. Sequoia Arc states outright that every deal is company-specific.

Unpublished terms are not automatically bad terms; they usually mean the program negotiates per company, which can work in your favor if you have leverage. But it moves work onto you. If the terms are not on the website, get them in writing before you invest interview time, and compare them against the transparent programs above as your baseline.

This is the same discipline we push founders toward in Elite Founders: treat every partnership offer, accelerator or otherwise, as a priced transaction with a baseline you can defend, not as a prize you won.

The zombie list

A surprising share of the accelerators still ranking in comparison articles are not operating as accelerators anymore. As of July 2026: AngelPad’s site describes an active program but no cohort has been documented since 2019. Boomtown appears to have pivoted to corporate innovation services. APX dropped its accelerator in 2021 and operates as an early-stage VC. Dreamit ended fixed cohorts and focuses on securetech investing. Village Global’s Network Catalyst is gone, replaced by conventional pre-seed investing. And 43North, which pays $1M for 5% if you relocate to Buffalo, has announced 2026 as its final competition.

Before you spend a weekend on any application, confirm the program ran a cohort in the last twelve months.

Three mistakes founders make with accelerator terms

1. Comparing checks instead of implied valuations. $500k for 10% and $125k for 7% are not “bigger and smaller checks”, they are different prices for your company. Do the division before you decide anything.

2. Ignoring the uncapped SAFE tranche. The modern standard deal (YC, Techstars, EF) is a fixed slice plus an uncapped MFN SAFE. That second tranche converts at your next round’s price, which means the true dilution depends on a valuation that does not exist yet. Model it at your realistic next-round number, not your hopeful one.

3. Trusting undated data. Techstars changed its deal in 2025. Neo changed in February 2026. Station F dropped its equity stake in 2024. Founder Institute cut its warrant from 4% to 2.5%. If the article you are reading does not say when its numbers were checked, assume they are wrong.

Where this fits in your funding path

An accelerator is one instrument among several, and the table makes the real question visible: what are you buying for that equity? If the answer is capital alone, some of these deals are expensive capital. If the answer is distribution, network, or a forcing function for a specific stage transition, the same deal can be cheap. That evaluation depends on where your company actually is, which is a diagnosis worth doing before any application, and it is exactly the kind of question we work through at our Founders Meetings, live sessions where founders pressure-test decisions like this one.

Download the full database above, put your offers next to the baseline, and negotiate from data instead of blog posts.

What you can read next

Resources For Women-Owned Businesses
O'Melveny, M Accelerator logos
O’Melveny Joins Forces with M Accelerator, Offering Exclusive Legal Guidance to the L.A. Incubator’s Innovative Startups
Shuta, Forbes 30 Under 30, from Japan

Search

Recent Posts

  • Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'The Liquid Death Marketing Strategy, Deconstructed: What Post-PMF Founders Can Actually Steal' — liquid death marketing strategy.

    The Liquid Death Marketing Strategy, Deconstructed: What Post-PMF Founders Can Actually Steal

    The Liquid Death marketing strategy is category...
  • Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'The Partnership Readiness Checklist Most Startups Fail (And How to Actually Pass It)' — Partnership Readiness Checklist for Startups.

    The Partnership Readiness Checklist Most Startups Fail (And How to Actually Pass It)

    You just got the warm intro. A distribution par...
  • Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'The Food & Beverage Customer Journey Map That Actually Changes What You Ship (Not Just a Pretty Diagram)' — How to Create a Customer Journey Map for Food and Beverage Brands.

    The Food & Beverage Customer Journey Map That Actually Changes What You Ship (Not Just a Pretty Diagram)

    To create a customer journey map for a food and...
  • Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'The Talent Code for Founders: Why Greatness Is Built, Not Hired' — The Talent Code: Unlocking the Secrets to Cultivating Greatness.

    The Talent Code for Founders: Why Greatness Is Built, Not Hired

    The Talent Code: Unlocking the Secrets to Culti...
  • Featured cover for the M Accelerator article 'The Fintech Customer Journey Map: Why Trust and Regulation Break the Standard Playbook' — How to Create a Customer Journey Map for Fintech Companies.

    The Fintech Customer Journey Map: Why Trust and Regulation Break the Standard Playbook

    Your signups are growing. Your marketing funnel...

Categories

  • accredited investors
  • Alumni Spotlight
  • blockchain
  • book club
  • Business Strategy
  • Elite Founders
  • Enterprise
  • Entrepreneur Series
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurship Program
  • Events
  • Family Offices
  • Finance
  • Founder Resources
  • Freelance
  • fundraising
  • Go To Market
  • growth hacking
  • Growth Mindset
  • Growth Strategy
  • Intrapreneurship
  • Investments
  • investors
  • Leadership
  • Los Angeles
  • Mentor Series
  • metaverse
  • Networking
  • News
  • no-code
  • pitch deck
  • Private Equity
  • School of Entrepreneurship
  • Spike Series
  • Sports
  • Startup
  • Startup Strategy
  • Startups
  • Venture Capital
  • web3

connect with us

Subscribe to AI Acceleration Newsletter

Our Approach

The Studio Framework

Network & Investment

Regulation D

Partners

Team

Coaches and Mentors

M ACCELERATOR
824 S Los Angeles St #400 Los Angeles CA 90014

T +1(310) 574-2495
Email: info@maccelerator.la

 Stripe Climate member

  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • LEGAL
  • COOKIE POLICY
  • GET SOCIAL

© 2025 MEDIARS LLC. All rights reserved.

TOP
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}