When starting a business with co-founders, deciding how to split equity is one of the most critical decisions you’ll face. It impacts ownership, decision-making, and investor confidence. Here’s what you need to know:
- Avoid equal splits unless contributions are truly identical. Research shows that equal splits can signal a lack of tough conversations, which may deter investors.
- Factor in contributions like time, money, and expertise. A full-time founder or one bringing unique technical skills might deserve a larger share than someone contributing part-time or less critical resources.
- Plan for the future. Use vesting schedules (e.g., four years with a one-year cliff) and clawback clauses to ensure equity reflects ongoing contributions.
- Document everything legally. Formal agreements and cap tables prevent misunderstandings and protect your company during disputes or funding rounds.
- Tailor the split to future roles. CEOs often take on more responsibility (e.g., fundraising), which could justify a larger stake.
Key takeaway: Equity splits should reflect each founder’s contributions and responsibilities, both now and in the future, while ensuring fairness and protecting the business.
How to decide on co-founder equity splits
Join our Elite Founders group and get guidance to shorten your journey
Key Factors in Equity Distribution
Deciding how to divide equity among co-founders is no small task. It involves carefully assessing each founder’s contributions, future potential, and level of commitment. The most successful startups take a structured approach to this decision, ensuring the arrangement feels fair and sets the stage for long-term success. Let’s break it down into three key areas: contributions, future roles, and legal safeguards.
Contributions: Time, Money, and Expertise
Not all contributions are created equal, and understanding what each co-founder brings to the table is crucial. Contributions typically fall into three categories: time, money, and expertise. Each plays a unique role depending on the needs of the business.
Time commitment is often the backbone of early-stage startups. Founders who dedicate themselves full-time are making a significant sacrifice, often passing up other opportunities. This level of commitment should carry more weight than part-time involvement.
Financial contributions are another major factor. Whether it’s direct cash investments or personal guarantees on loans, money matters. For example, if one founder contributes $50,000 and another puts in $10,000, the equity split should reflect this difference. But money isn’t everything – technical skills or other critical expertise can outweigh cash in certain cases. For instance, a technical co-founder who builds the core product might deserve a larger share even with a smaller financial input.
Expertise and skills are often the hardest to measure, but they can be game-changers. A founder with deep industry knowledge, valuable connections, or a track record of scaling businesses brings intangible benefits that are just as critical as cash or time. Balancing all these contributions is key to achieving an equitable split.
Future Roles and Responsibilities
While past contributions are important, equity should primarily reflect what each co-founder is expected to contribute moving forward. This ensures the split aligns with the people driving the company’s growth.
"The equity should be split based on value creation."
– Peter Pham, Serial Entrepreneur, Angel Investor, Startup Advisor, and Cofounder of Science
Leadership roles often come with varying levels of impact. For example, the CEO typically handles fundraising, strategic planning, and building external relationships – responsibilities that directly influence the company’s valuation. As Peter Pham highlights:
"Generally the CEO gets more."
Other key roles, like CTO or CMO, also deserve thoughtful consideration. In a tech-driven startup, the CTO’s work on the core technology might warrant an equity share close to or equal to the CEO’s. Similarly, a CMO focused on driving customer acquisition and revenue growth brings measurable value that should be reflected in their stake.
It’s also important to think long-term. Roles can evolve as the company grows – a technical founder might shift to managing an engineering team, while a business-focused founder could transition into operations or sales. Planning for these changes ensures the equity split stays fair over time.
Vesting Schedules and Clawback Clauses
Even the best equity split can fall apart if a co-founder leaves early and retains their full stake. That’s where vesting schedules and clawback clauses come in. These tools protect the company and ensure equity is tied to ongoing contributions.
A standard vesting schedule spans four years with a one-year cliff. This means a co-founder must stay with the company for at least one year before any equity vests. After that, 25% of their shares vest, with the remaining 75% vesting monthly over the next three years. This setup prevents someone from walking away with a large equity share after only a few months.
Clawback clauses provide an additional layer of security. They allow the company to repurchase unvested shares at fair market value if a co-founder leaves voluntarily or is terminated for cause. This helps maintain team stability and protects the company’s value.
In some cases, acceleration clauses can be included for flexibility. For example, single-trigger acceleration vests all shares immediately upon acquisition, while double-trigger acceleration requires both an acquisition and the co-founder losing their job. These mechanisms not only protect the company but also demonstrate strong governance to potential investors.
Popular Equity Split Models
Choosing how to divide equity among founders is a critical decision that can shape the dynamics of your team. While there’s no universal formula, understanding the most common equity split models can help you make an informed choice that aligns with your startup’s vision.
Equal Splits
The equal split is often the go-to choice for founders. In fact, data shows that in 2024, 45.9% of two-person founding teams opted for an equal split, a significant rise from 31.5% in 2015. For three-person teams, the percentage jumped from 12.1% to 26.9% over the same period.
This model appeals to many because it feels fair – everyone gets the same share, reflecting equal commitment. But it’s not without its challenges. Equal splits can lead to decision-making deadlocks when founders disagree, and research reveals that teams defaulting to this approach are three times more likely to experience dissatisfaction among members. Frances Mosley, Partner at DLA Piper, advises founders to think carefully about their contributions:
"Founders should consider the degree of commitment that a certain founder is making. What kind of role do they have, what have they contributed to the company so far, and what are they going to contribute going forward?"
Equal splits work best when all founders bring similar skills, take on comparable risks, and plan to contribute equally over time. If contributions differ significantly, a more tailored equity model might be a better fit.
Contribution-Based Splits
This model allocates equity based on the measurable value each founder brings to the table. Factors like financial investment, time commitment, technical expertise, and industry connections are all taken into account. The idea is to create a split that reflects the actual input and impact of each founder.
To make this work, founders need to have open and honest conversations about their roles. For example, how does a financial investment compare to full-time technical work? What’s the value of a founder bringing key industry relationships? Some teams develop scoring systems or use percentage-based methods to weigh contributions. This clarity can also appeal to investors who want to see thoughtful and transparent equity decisions. That said, reaching agreement on how to value different types of contributions can be a tough process.
Dynamic Equity Splits
Dynamic equity models bring flexibility by allowing equity to evolve over time. Instead of locking in percentages from the start, ownership adjusts as roles and contributions change. For example, equity might be redistributed when specific milestones or performance benchmarks are hit.
This approach rewards ongoing contributions rather than focusing solely on what founders bring at the beginning. As Shikhar Ghosh, a Serial Entrepreneur and Harvard Business School Professor, puts it:
"One of the biggest mistakes most people make at the outset is obsessing over how to divide the pie based on early contributions instead of designing their team to build the biggest pie."
However, dynamic splits come with their own challenges. They require meticulous tracking systems, regular evaluations, and clear performance metrics to avoid disputes over shifting ownership. Y Combinator Partner Michael Seibel highlights the ultimate goal:
"Equity splits should maximize motivation"
Dynamic models can be a great way to reflect the evolving nature of a startup, but they demand strong communication and a commitment to fairness over time.
Negotiating and Finalizing Equity Splits
After exploring various equity models, it’s time to tackle one of the most pivotal discussions for your startup: how to divide equity among founders. This isn’t just a casual conversation – over 50% of founder disputes arise from disagreements over equity splits and unclear expectations. Getting this right can make or break your team’s long-term success.
Preparing for Equity Discussions
The foundation of any successful equity negotiation is transparency. Everyone needs to openly discuss their expectations, level of commitment, and the specific contributions they bring to the table. This includes factors like time investment, financial contributions, expertise, and intellectual property.
Using tools can add clarity to the process. Startup equity calculators, for example, allow teams to evaluate and compare contributions across various categories, such as funding, skills, time, and connections. These tools provide a measurable, data-driven framework that minimizes bias and keeps the discussion focused on facts.
Take this example: a team of three founders – one provided the initial funding, another developed the product, and the third brought critical industry relationships. By using an equity calculator, they assigned weighted values to each contribution and landed on a split of 40/35/25. Because the method was transparent, everyone understood and accepted the outcome.
Once you’ve established a clear understanding of everyone’s contributions, you’re ready to move into negotiations with a solid foundation.
Best Practices for Negotiation
Negotiating equity requires more than just numbers – it demands clear communication and a structured approach. Start by documenting each founder’s specific roles, responsibilities, and anticipated future contributions. Avoid making assumptions about what everyone "brings to the table" without discussing it openly and thoroughly.
Set ground rules for your discussions. Encourage active listening, ensure all voices are heard, and focus on separating personal emotions from business decisions. When disagreements arise – and they will – it’s essential to have pre-agreed methods for resolution, like mediation or majority voting. These processes can keep conversations productive instead of letting them spiral into conflict.
In some cases, bringing in a neutral party, such as a mentor or advisor, can help. Their outside perspective may highlight blind spots or lead to creative solutions that satisfy the entire team.
Plan for the future. As your startup grows, roles and contributions will evolve. Agree upfront to revisit equity arrangements periodically, not to renegotiate constantly but to ensure the agreement remains fair as circumstances change. Scheduled check-ins can help maintain trust and alignment over time.
One key takeaway: resist the urge to split equity equally just to avoid conflict. Research from Harvard Business School indicates that investors are less likely to back startups with equal splits, seeing them as a sign that founders avoided tough conversations.
Documenting Agreements Legally
Once you’ve reached an agreement, it’s essential to formalize it. Proper documentation protects everyone involved and reduces the risk of future disputes. Two key documents to prioritize are the founder agreement and the cap table.
- A founder agreement should clearly outline each founder’s equity share, roles, vesting schedules, and procedures for handling disputes or departures.
- A cap table tracks ownership percentages and shows how future funding rounds will impact everyone’s stakes. Keeping this document updated is vital as your company grows and takes on investors.
To further safeguard your startup, adopt a standard vesting schedule – typically four years with a one-year cliff – and include clawback provisions. These measures protect the company if a founder leaves early and signal to investors that the team is committed for the long haul.
Don’t try to navigate this legal terrain alone. Hire a startup attorney to ensure your agreements are legally binding and enforceable[3]. The upfront cost of legal help is a small price to pay compared to the potential fallout from poorly documented arrangements.
Once everything is finalized, take immediate steps to solidify your decisions: draft and sign the founder agreement, update the cap table, and file any necessary paperwork with state and federal authorities. Communicate the finalized equity structure to all stakeholders and establish a process for periodic reviews as your company evolves.
sbb-itb-32a2de3
Legal, Tax, and Investor Considerations
When it comes to preparing your startup for investment and long-term growth, legal, tax, and investor considerations are just as important as internal equity negotiations. Founders who understand these factors can make smarter decisions, avoid costly mistakes, and set their companies up for success.
Legal Structures and Compliance
The legal structure of your startup determines how equity is distributed and the compliance requirements you’ll need to meet. In the U.S., most startups choose between C corporations and LLCs, each with its own set of rules impacting equity agreements.
C corporations are a favorite among investors because they allow for flexibility in equity distribution. For example, they support multiple stock classes, which can simplify future funding rounds. However, they also come with stricter compliance requirements, such as maintaining corporate formalities and properly documenting all stock issuances.
On the other hand, LLCs offer operational flexibility but can complicate equity arrangements. Instead of issuing shares, LLCs allocate ownership interests, which can be structured in various ways but may not align with what traditional investors expect.
Regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. The SEC oversees all equity securities transactions, so startups must adhere to these regulations from the start. Every equity issuance needs to be recorded in the capitalization table and backed by proper documentation. Using compliance checklists can help ensure all disclosure, registration, and exemption requirements are met.
Hiring experienced legal counsel early on is a smart move. They can help structure founder shares correctly and ensure compliance with applicable laws. While this may seem like an upfront expense, it’s an investment that can save you from headaches later and make your equity agreements ready for investor scrutiny.
Tax Considerations for Founders
Once your legal structure is in place, tax planning becomes essential for maximizing the benefits of your equity. The type of equity you receive – whether it’s ISOs, NSOs, RSUs, or RSAs – has different tax implications, so careful planning is key.
For example, filing an 83(b) election can save founders a lot in taxes by allowing them to pay taxes on the current fair market value of their equity rather than its potentially higher future value. This can result in significant savings if your startup’s valuation increases over time.
"The most prudent thing for startups is to plan how to treat equity well before any potential liquidity event and ensure that employees understand the tax implications of exercising options."
Timing is everything when it comes to tax planning. Exercising stock options early can allow founders to qualify for lower long-term capital gains tax rates instead of higher ordinary income tax rates. Additionally, taking advantage of the Qualified Small Business Exemption could help founders avoid federal taxes on capital gains up to $10 million if certain conditions are met.
However, things can get tricky with the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), particularly for ISOs. While ISOs are only taxed when the stock is sold, they may trigger AMT obligations, adding another layer of complexity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for making the right decisions about your equity.
Accurate 409A valuations are also critical for compliance and tax calculations. Working with tax professionals can help you navigate these complexities and avoid costly mistakes. Proper tax planning not only benefits founders financially but also reassures investors that your startup is financially sound.
Investor Evaluation of Equity Splits
Investors pay close attention to equity arrangements when deciding whether to fund a startup. A poorly structured equity split can raise red flags, signaling instability or poor decision-making. A clean capitalization table with well-thought-out equity distribution is essential for attracting serious investors.
Data shows that equity splits among founders have evolved. In 2024, nearly 46% of two-person founding teams split equity equally, compared to just over 31% in 2015. However, equal splits aren’t always the best choice; only about one-third of companies across all team sizes allocate equal equity to co-founders. This suggests that while equal splits are common, they don’t always align with investor expectations.
Investors prefer structured vesting schedules because they bring clarity and predictability to equity distribution, reducing the risk of unexpected dilution.
"Investors prefer startups with structured vesting schedules because this structure provides transparency and predictability regarding the startup equity distribution. For investors, vesting schedules reduce the risk of unexpected dilution."
Frances Mosley, a partner at DLA Piper, highlights the importance of tailoring equity decisions to individual contributions:
"Founders should consider the degree of commitment that a certain founder is making. What kind of role do they have, what have they contributed to the company so far, and what are they going to contribute going forward?"
There’s also a potential downside to watch for. Research from Harvard Business Review shows that as startups mature, the percentage of founders unhappy with their equity split increases by 2.5 times. This dissatisfaction can create problems during investor due diligence, as investors look for founders who can handle tough conversations about equity.
To meet investor expectations, it’s vital to maintain transparent and open discussions about each founder’s contributions and future role. Document your equity agreements thoroughly and establish a process for reviewing them as your company grows. These practices demonstrate the kind of leadership that inspires investor confidence and sets your startup apart.
How M Accelerator Supports Equity Splits
When it comes to equity splits, M Accelerator goes beyond the basics, offering hands-on, tailored support to founders. Getting this right isn’t just about having a good idea or using generic tools – it’s about strategic planning, clear communication, and navigating the legal and financial complexities that can shape your startup’s future. With a proven framework that has guided over 500 founders, M Accelerator helps entrepreneurs build strong foundations for their businesses.
Unified Approach to Equity Negotiations
M Accelerator takes a different path when it comes to equity splits. Instead of relying on generic formulas, they use a unified framework that integrates strategy, execution, and communication. This ensures that every step – from planning to implementation – works seamlessly together.
The process involves evaluating each founder’s contributions, future roles, and the specific needs of the business. Alessandro Marianantoni, Founder of M Accelerator, explains their hands-on philosophy:
"Our main value is on the learning process, but it is a different kind of learning, in our programs we don’t do theory, we create a place for our participants to do the work they need to do to grow their businesses."
This practical approach ensures equity discussions are more than just theoretical – they’re strategic decisions that align with your company’s growth goals. By identifying critical business factors, the framework helps founders make informed equity decisions that meet both market and investor expectations.
Personalized Coaching and Workshops
M Accelerator’s coaching programs are designed to tackle the unique challenges founders face with equity structuring. Through initiatives like the Elite Founder Team mastermind program, early-stage coaching, and scale-up programs, participants receive tailored guidance that matches their specific needs.
With small cohorts of just 4–5 businesses (about 1–2% of applicants), founders benefit from highly personalized coaching. Whether it’s addressing uneven contributions, navigating complex vesting schedules, or preparing for investor scrutiny, the focus is on practical solutions.
The impact of this personalized approach is evident. In 2021, Abi Hannah, CEO of Fertility Circle, raised $800,000 after completing the MA Startup Program. Reflecting on her experience, she said:
"We’ve been blown away by the level of support during the MA Startup Program. Your method, style, and advice are really wonderful – thanks for doing what you do!"
The coaching doesn’t stop at equity splits. Founders also receive guidance on pitch deck creation, fundraising strategies, and investor relations – all areas that directly tie into equity decisions. This holistic approach ensures founders not only structure their equity effectively but also present it in a way that resonates with investors during funding rounds.
Proven Track Record and Resources
M Accelerator’s track record speaks volumes. With over $50 million in funding facilitated and access to a network of 25,000+ investors, they provide founders with the tools and connections needed for long-term success. This extensive network ensures that founders can present well-structured equity agreements to investors who understand their value.
The program’s experience spans startups at various stages, from early beginnings to pre-IPO companies with over 100 employees. This breadth of experience highlights how early decisions about equity can shape a company’s growth and investor relationships.
Every month, M Accelerator features 2–3 companies to its investor network, creating ongoing opportunities for founders who have thoughtfully structured their equity. Beyond just learning how to divide equity fairly, participants gain insights into presenting these decisions in ways that attract serious investor interest.
Their support also includes financial planning and reporting, ensuring equity decisions are grounded in solid business fundamentals. This financial expertise helps founders avoid basing decisions solely on abstract fairness, instead rooting them in practical, scalable strategies.
Francesco Simeone, CEO of Tora Tora Travel, is a testament to this comprehensive support. After joining the program in 2018 to refine his ideas, his business has grown to 12 employees. His success highlights how strong foundational decisions, including equity structuring, can drive sustainable growth.
Conclusion
Getting equity splits right from the beginning lays the groundwork for lasting success. The way you structure equity today impacts team collaboration, investor confidence, and your startup’s ability to scale in the future.
Key Takeaways
Start equity discussions with open and regular communication among co-founders. Create an environment where everyone feels comfortable sharing their expectations, concerns, and long-term goals. Regularly revisiting these conversations can help resolve small issues before they escalate.
Seek professional guidance early. While online tools and templates are helpful starting points, the expertise of legal professionals and experienced mentors is invaluable. Lawyers can draft solid founder agreements and vesting schedules, while advisors provide clarity on navigating the complexities of equity allocation.
Vesting schedules are essential for protecting your startup. A standard four-year vesting schedule with a one-year cliff encourages long-term dedication and safeguards the company if a founder departs prematurely.
Document every agreement. Put all equity arrangements in writing, and include provisions for periodic reviews to adapt to your startup’s evolving needs.
Stay flexible to support growth. Plan for future scenarios, such as funding rounds, employee stock options, or shifts in founder contributions. What feels fair today might need to evolve as your business scales and circumstances change.
These principles, combined with the strategies outlined earlier, ensure your equity structure supports both immediate priorities and long-term aspirations.
Next Steps for Founders
Taking a structured and proactive approach to equity decisions from the outset is crucial for your startup’s success. Begin by defining clear roles and responsibilities among co-founders, establish vesting schedules, and model how future funding rounds might affect ownership.
Equity splits involve legal, tax, and investor considerations, so expert advice is key. M Accelerator provides proven frameworks and expert coaching to help align your equity decisions with your growth goals.
Don’t leave equity splits to chance. Act now to create an equity structure that reflects your vision, protects your team, and positions your company for future opportunities.
FAQs
What are vesting schedules and clawback clauses, and how do they help protect a startup when splitting equity among co-founders?
Vesting schedules are a practical way to ensure that co-founders earn their equity gradually, typically over a four-year span with a one-year cliff. This setup promotes commitment and keeps everyone focused on the company’s long-term goals. For instance, if a co-founder decides to leave early, any unvested shares stay with the company, preventing uneven ownership.
Clawback clauses add another layer of security by giving the company the right to reclaim equity if a co-founder violates agreements, engages in misconduct, or leaves prematurely. These measures work together to protect the startup’s equity structure and maintain fairness as the business evolves.
How do you decide between an equal equity split and a contribution-based model for co-founders?
Deciding how to split equity among co-founders is a critical step for any startup. The choice between an equal equity split and a contribution-based model largely depends on what each founder brings to the table.
An equal split makes sense when all co-founders are contributing similar levels of time, energy, and resources. It’s a simple way to divide ownership and can help build a strong sense of partnership while avoiding early disputes over who deserves what.
In contrast, a contribution-based model works better when contributions vary significantly. For example, one founder might invest more capital, bring specialized industry knowledge, or open doors to valuable networks. Tying equity to these contributions ensures that each person’s value to the business is properly recognized.
Ultimately, the right approach should aim to balance fairness, motivation, and the long-term dedication of everyone involved.
How can startups structure equity splits to attract investors and secure funding?
Startups can draw the attention of investors and secure funding by carefully structuring equity splits that emphasize fairness, strategic foresight, and the potential for long-term growth. Founders should aim to retain a substantial ownership stake – usually between 40% and 60% – to signal their commitment and maintain control. At the same time, allocating equity to key team members and advisors is crucial for incentivizing their performance and aligning everyone’s interests.
Investors are attracted to equity distributions that balance rewarding past contributions with preparing for future roles. Such arrangements indicate a stable and strategic approach to growth. A well-planned equity split not only motivates the team but also reassures investors that the startup is positioned for success, making it a more compelling funding opportunity.
