×

JOIN in 3 Steps

1 RSVP and Join The Founders Meeting
2 Apply
3 Start The Journey with us!
+1(310) 574-2495
Mo-Fr 9-5pm Pacific Time
  • SUPPORT

M ACCELERATOR by M Studio

M ACCELERATOR by M Studio

AI + GTM Engineering for Growing Businesses

T +1 (310) 574-2495
Email: info@maccelerator.la

M ACCELERATOR
824 S. Los Angeles St #400 Los Angeles CA 90014

  • WHAT WE DO
    • VENTURE STUDIO
      • The Studio Approach
      • Elite Foundersonline
      • Strategy & GTM Engineering
      • Startup Program – Early Stageonline
    •  
      • Web3 Nexusonline
      • Hackathononline
      • Early Stage Startup in Los Angeles
      • Reg D + Accredited Investors
    • Other Programs
      • Entrepreneurship Programs for Partners
      • Business Innovationonline
      • Strategic Persuasiononline
      • MA NoCode Bootcamponline
  • COMMUNITY
    • Our Framework
    • COACHES & MENTORS
    • PARTNERS
    • TEAM
  • BLOG
  • EVENTS
    • SPIKE Series
    • Pitch Day & Talks
    • Our Events on lu.ma
Join
AIAcceleration
  • Home
  • blog
  • Entrepreneurship
  • should I use a sales agency or build in-house sales at $100K ARR?

should I use a sales agency or build in-house sales at $100K ARR?

Alessandro Marianantoni
Monday, 17 November 2025 / Published in Entrepreneurship

should I use a sales agency or build in-house sales at $100K ARR?

should I use a sales agency or build in-house sales at $100K ARR?

At $100K ARR, your sales strategy can make or break your growth. The choice between hiring a sales agency or building an in-house team comes down to budget, speed, and control. Here’s the quick answer:

  • Sales Agency: Faster to start, lower upfront costs, but limited control over messaging and customer interactions. Costs range from $5,000–$12,000/month (retainers + commissions).
  • In-House Sales: Full control over the process, but higher costs and slower ramp-up. Expect to spend $79,000–$125,000 annually per rep, with months of hiring and training.

Key Takeaway: If you need quick results and have limited resources, a sales agency is better. If long-term control and alignment with your company’s vision are priorities, go in-house. Some startups combine both – start with an agency, then transition in-house as you grow.


Quick Comparison:

Factor Sales Agency In-House Sales
Ramp-Up Speed 2–4 weeks 4–6 months
Cost $5,000–$12,000/month $79,000–$125,000/year per hire
Scalability Flexible, fast adjustments Slow, requires significant budget
Control Limited Full

Read on for a detailed breakdown of both options to help you decide.

Demand Generation: When to Hire an Agency and When to Go In-House

1. Sales Agency

Sales agencies offer startups with $100K ARR a quick and budget-friendly path to scale without committing to the costs of a full-time team. These agencies come equipped with established systems, experienced professionals, and immediate access to markets, giving your growth efforts a serious boost. For founders who are already stretched thin with product development, fundraising, and daily operations, outsourcing sales can free up valuable time to focus on what matters most. Let’s break down the key aspects – speed, cost, scalability, and control.

Ramp-Up Speed

One of the biggest advantages of sales agencies is how quickly they can get you up and running. Building an in-house sales team takes time – hiring and training an SDR can take 3–6 months before they’re fully productive. In contrast, agencies can start generating leads in just 2–4 weeks. They come prepared with the tools, infrastructure, and seasoned reps who know how to handle different industries and buyer personas. This speed can be a game-changer, especially if you need to strike while the market is hot or show quick results to investors. Plus, their proven strategies spare you the trial-and-error headaches that often come with building an internal team from scratch.

Cost Structure

Sales agencies typically operate on a performance-based pricing model, which works well for startups managing tight budgets. The usual setup includes a monthly retainer ranging from $3,000 to $8,000, along with commission rates of 15–25% on closed deals. For a startup with $100K ARR, this means monthly expenses generally fall between $5,000 and $12,000, including both retainers and commissions. Compare that to the roughly $100K annual cost of hiring an in-house SDR (including benefits, equipment, and training), and the agency model offers a more predictable and performance-driven expense. For example, if your average deal size is $5,000, you’d pay around $750 to $1,250 per closed deal through an agency.

Scalability

When it comes to scaling, agencies have the upper hand. Need to double your outreach efforts? Agencies can typically expand their team within weeks, not months. This flexibility is invaluable when you’re testing new markets, rolling out a product, or dealing with seasonal spikes in demand. However, there’s a catch – agencies often juggle multiple clients, which means they might not always give you their undivided attention during busy times. And as your deal volume grows, building an in-house team could eventually become more cost-effective.

Operational Control

The trade-off for working with an agency is giving up some control. You won’t have as much say over day-to-day activities, messaging, or customer interactions. External reps may not fully understand your company culture or grasp the finer details of your product. While most agencies provide regular updates and are open to feedback on scripts and processes, they lack the flexibility of an internal team when it comes to making quick adjustments. For startups where maintaining brand consistency and delivering a seamless customer experience are top priorities, this loss of direct oversight – and the reliance on an external partner – can be a significant drawback.

2. In-House Sales

Building your own sales team at $100K ARR gives you full control over the sales process but comes with high upfront costs and longer timelines. It allows you to develop deep product knowledge and manage every aspect of the customer experience. Let’s dive into how it compares in terms of ramp-up speed, cost structure, scalability, and operational control.

Ramp-Up Speed

Creating an in-house sales team takes time and effort. Hiring alone can cost around $4,000 per hire and take 4–8 weeks. If you use a recruitment agency, fees can range from $11,000 to $22,000, or 15–30% of the hire’s annual salary. Even after onboarding, it typically takes three months for new hires to reach full productivity. This means you’re looking at a 4–6 month delay before seeing significant results.

Here’s another challenge: sales development representatives (SDRs) have an average tenure of just 14.2 months. Many leave before completing a full year of hitting quotas, forcing you to start the hiring process all over again. This can be especially tough when you’re trying to meet growth milestones or keep investors happy.

Cost Structure

The costs of building an in-house team go beyond salaries. While the average base salary for a sales rep is about $74,000, benefits, training, and software add another $2,650 to $12,000 per year. This brings the total annual cost per rep to somewhere between $79,150 and $125,000.

On top of that, commissions typically account for 20–25% of the Annual Contract Value (ACV). For startups with tight budgets, ensuring your reps generate enough revenue to cover these expenses can be a tall order.

Scalability

Scaling an in-house team isn’t just expensive – it’s slow. Doubling your sales capacity could set you back over $200,000 annually and take months to execute. For startups at $100K ARR, these fixed costs might mean raising more funds or cutting budgets in other areas. Compared to the flexibility of outsourcing to an agency, scaling internally can feel like a much heavier lift.

Operational Control

One of the biggest advantages of an in-house team is control. You oversee every customer interaction, giving you the ability to quickly tweak messaging and processes. Your sales team becomes a direct extension of your company’s vision, helping to build strong relationships with prospects and providing valuable feedback from the market.

You also have the freedom to design custom compensation plans, training programs, and career paths. If market conditions shift or your strategy needs a pivot, your internal team can adjust immediately, ensuring your sales efforts stay aligned with your goals.

sbb-itb-32a2de3

Pros and Cons

Here’s a breakdown of the key trade-offs when deciding between a sales agency and an in-house sales team:

Factor Sales Agency In-House Sales Team
Ramp-Up Speed Fast – Ready to operate in 6–8 weeks due to established systems and processes Slow – Takes several months to deliver results, with full productivity often requiring 6–12 months
Cost Structure Variable – Performance-based fees with lower upfront costs Fixed – High upfront investment for hiring, onboarding, and training, plus ongoing expenses
Scalability Flexible – Easy to adjust based on your needs without long-term commitments Less Flexible – Scaling requires significant investment and extended timelines
Operational Control Limited – Day-to-day sales activities and customer interactions are handled externally Complete – Full control over processes, messaging, and customer relationships

This table highlights the main differences, but let’s dive deeper into what these mean for your business.

Agencies bring specialists to the table quickly, often ramping up in a matter of weeks. In contrast, building an in-house team takes time – typically several months to get started and up to a year to achieve full productivity. MarketStar research supports this, noting: "outsourced teams consistently drive revenue within four to six months, rather than up to a year by a newly established in-house team."

"Sales outsourcing providers can offer businesses a faster speed to hire, as they have established recruitment and training processes in place." – MarketStar

From a financial perspective, agencies require less upfront investment since their fees are often tied to performance, though costs may rise as your business grows. On the other hand, in-house teams demand significant initial spending for recruitment, onboarding, and training, along with regular fixed costs. For startups operating at $100K ARR, managing these financial demands can be crucial.

The choice often comes down to speed versus control. Agencies offer quick results with their expertise, making them ideal for businesses needing fast traction or meeting tight investor deadlines. In-house teams, while slower to get off the ground, can eventually become a seamless part of your company, reflecting its values and culture.

Ultimately, the best approach depends on your growth stage and priorities. If capturing immediate market opportunities is critical, an agency’s rapid deployment may be the way to go. But if you’re focused on long-term growth and have the resources to invest, building an in-house team could align better with your goals.

Conclusion

When weighing your options, it all comes down to balancing immediate needs with long-term goals. The decision should factor in three key elements: timeline, budget, and vision for the future.

If your priority is quick market entry, a sales agency might be the way to go. Agencies bring specialized expertise, flexible costs, and can help you gain traction fast. On the other hand, if you’re ready to invest in building a dedicated team, can handle a slower start, and value having direct control over customer relationships, an in-house sales team could be the better fit. This route allows you to align the sales process with your company’s overall culture and strategy.

Some startups find success by blending both approaches. For instance, you could start with an agency to validate your market, then transition to an in-house team as your operations grow. This hybrid model offers the speed and expertise of external support early on, while setting the stage for long-term customization and control.

No matter which path you choose, integrating automation tools into your sales process can boost efficiency. If you’re looking for actionable insights on using AI to drive revenue growth, consider subscribing to our AI Acceleration Newsletter for weekly frameworks designed for founders.

Ultimately, the decision should reflect your startup’s financial position, growth stage, and strategic priorities. Agencies offer speed and expertise but less control, while in-house teams provide deeper customization at the cost of slower progress. Align your choice with your current goals to pave the way for sustainable growth as you approach the critical $100K ARR milestone.

FAQs

How do I decide between hiring a sales agency or building an in-house sales team at $100,000 ARR?

When you’re at the $100,000 ARR mark and trying to decide between a sales agency or building an in-house sales team, there are a few important factors to think about:

  • Budget: A sales agency can be a cost-effective option with lower upfront expenses. On the other hand, hiring an in-house team means taking on higher initial costs, including salaries, benefits, and training.
  • Scalability: Sales agencies are often quicker to adjust to your growth needs. Expanding an in-house team, however, takes more time, effort, and resources.
  • Control: With an in-house team, you have more direct oversight and influence over your sales processes. Agencies, meanwhile, tend to operate with more independence.
  • Expertise: Agencies usually bring a wealth of specialized skills and market knowledge, which can be a huge advantage if you’re an early-stage startup without an established sales framework.

The right choice depends on your company’s unique goals and resources. Carefully consider these factors to align with your growth strategy.

What’s the best way for a startup to shift from a sales agency to building an in-house sales team as it scales?

Transitioning from working with a sales agency to building your own in-house sales team takes thoughtful planning to avoid disruption. Start by evaluating your budget, operational requirements, and long-term growth objectives. For example, if your business is generating $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR), consider whether that income can cover the expenses of hiring, training, and managing an internal team.

Take a step-by-step approach to shift responsibilities from the agency to your team. Begin by observing the agency’s processes, documenting their workflows, and developing expertise within your company. Recruiting team members with relevant experience and investing in sales tools can help streamline operations and make the transition smoother. The goal is to create a setup that allows for scalability and greater control, ensuring the move supports your startup’s growth plans.

What are the advantages and risks of using both a sales agency and an in-house sales team for a startup?

A hybrid sales approach – blending a sales agency with your in-house team – can be a smart move for startups looking to grow efficiently. This model lets your internal team concentrate on building strong client relationships and crafting the broader sales strategy, while the agency takes care of tasks like lead generation, prospecting, and gathering market insights.

This setup brings several advantages: more flexibility, quicker access to specialized skills, and faster onboarding. That said, it’s crucial to address potential challenges, like mismatched goals or communication breakdowns between the agency and your team. By setting clear expectations, fostering regular collaboration, and defining roles upfront, you can ensure both teams work together smoothly to drive growth.

Related Blog Posts

  • Preparing my startup for sale
  • When Your Agency Can’t Build What They Recommend: The Implementation Gap Costing You $40K+
  • How do sales-led B2B startups typically structure their first sales team?
  • Should I hire a VP of Sales or start with AEs at seed stage?

What you can read next

Serena's Business Slam: How Williams Built a Venture Empire While Dominating Tennis
Serena’s Business Slam: How Williams Built a Venture Empire While Dominating Tennis
CLV to CAC Ratio: Guide for Startups 2025
CLV to CAC Ratio: Guide for Startups 2025
Off-Field Vision: How Elite Athletes Spot Business Opportunities Others Miss
Off-Field Vision: How Elite Athletes Spot Business Opportunities Others Miss

Search

Recent Posts

  • Investor Readiness as a System, Not a Story - Investor Readiness as a System Not a Story 1

    Investor Readiness as a System, Not a Story

    Advanced founders don’t just pitch investors; t...
  • The Revenue Engine Audit: 15 Questions to Find Your Leaks

    The Revenue Engine Audit: 15 Questions to Find Your Leaks

    Answer 15 targeted questions and use a 0–30 sco...
  • N8N Workflows for B2B Revenue Automation (No Code Required)

    N8N Workflows for B2B Revenue Automation (No Code Required)

    Five practical no-code n8n workflows to enrich ...
  • From Overflowing Demand to Signal-Driven Focus - From Overflowing Demand to Signal Driven Focus

    From Overflowing Demand to Signal-Driven Focus

    A founder with “too many inbound deals” sounds ...
  • Building a Revenue Engine That Scales from $100K to $10M ARR

    Building a Revenue Engine That Scales from $100K to $10M ARR

    Stage-by-stage roadmap for building modular rev...

Categories

  • accredited investors
  • Alumni Spotlight
  • blockchain
  • book club
  • Business Strategy
  • Enterprise
  • Entrepreneur Series
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurship Program
  • Events
  • Family Offices
  • Finance
  • Freelance
  • fundraising
  • Go To Market
  • growth hacking
  • Growth Mindset
  • Intrapreneurship
  • Investments
  • investors
  • Leadership
  • Los Angeles
  • Mentor Series
  • metaverse
  • Networking
  • News
  • no-code
  • pitch deck
  • Private Equity
  • School of Entrepreneurship
  • Spike Series
  • Sports
  • Startup
  • Startups
  • Venture Capital
  • web3

connect with us

Subscribe to AI Acceleration Newsletter

Our Approach

The Studio Framework

Coaching Programs

Elite Founders

Startup Program

Strategic Persuasion

Growth-Stage Startup

Network & Investment

Regulation D

Events

Startups

Blog

Partners

Team

Coaches and Mentors

M ACCELERATOR
824 S Los Angeles St #400 Los Angeles CA 90014

T +1(310) 574-2495
Email: info@maccelerator.la

 Stripe Climate member

  • DISCLAIMER
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • LEGAL
  • COOKIE POLICY
  • GET SOCIAL

© 2025 MEDIARS LLC. All rights reserved.

TOP
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}